The current financial crisis

The public have a common understanding that the subprime mortgage crisis has leaded to a far more serious consequence, so called ‘the financial crisis’ recently. To be exact, It has been going on for seven months. But how will that be happened? This is the question. The subprime load crisis is relatively simple to understand. People bought homes they couldn’t afford, and now they are falling behind on their home loans. This has caused the loss of related financial institutions.

However, the amount of loss is not the major cause of the financial crisis. US government has already announced to take over Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and AIG, and have injected the capital over that amount into the market. Besides, the majority of homeowners are still doing just fine. The conventional mortgage market is still healthy. So, how is it that a mess concentrated in one part of the mortgage business: the subprime loans, has frozen up the whole credit markets in United States? How would that crisis caused such a big impact to the stock market, causing the collapse of Bear Sterns, Lehman brothers, etc, and left the economy on the brink of the worst recession in a generation and forced the Federal Reserve to take its boldest action since the Depression in 1923?
 
In order to have a big picture of this incident, I think this could be explained in this way. First of all, behind the whole financial crisis, there are actually 3 major components: the subprime mortgage, Leverage (or gearing), and the Credit Default Swap(CDS). We have mentioned about subprime mortgage before. So, what is leverage? In the finance industry, leverage is a common way to use in such a way to magnify the outcome of the investments. This can be done by various financial instruments such as options, futures, margin or borrowed capital, to increase the potential return of an investment. 
 
At present, many investment banks use leverage to operate more then 20 times of their capital. For example, if bank A have an asset of 5 billion, then 30 times of leverage means that bank A can operate 150 billions of money, in which most are borrowed. It is obvious, if there is 5% of profit in the investment, then bank A has a profit of 7.5 billion. However, on the other hand, if there is 5% loss in the investment, then bank A loss all it’s 5 billion of asset, and still owe the lender 2.5 billion.
 
The third component is CDS. What is CDS? As explained above, the operation of leverage is very risky. So some bankers think of a way to take insurance on these leverage. This insurance is called CDS. It is a specific kind of agreement which allows the transfer of third party credit risk from one party to the other. One party in the swap is a lender and faces credit risk from a third party, and the counterparty in the credit default swap agrees to insure this risk in exchange of regular periodic payments. For example, Peter borrows $100 from John. John wants to get insurance on this $100 debt in case Peter was unable to return the money. The John goes to Jane and asked for Jane to insurance that debt. Jane agrees to do so if John is willing to pay her an insurance fee of $5 per year. That is exactly the most simplified scenario of CDS.
 
Now, apply that in the world of banks. Recall the example of ‘bank A’. Bank A operates a leverage of 30 times. To reduce the risk, it goes to bank B and asked for bank B to do CDS insurance. After analysis the market data, bank B knows that the breach of contract case is less than 1%. Therefore, bank B is willing to take that insurance to earn the insurance fee. However, this is not the end of the story. Although bank B agree to accept the insurance, it can not have the insurance fee immediately. At the same time, some other banks such as bank C, bank D, etc. are interested to these CDS contracts. So bank B is willing to re-sell them to other banks to have the cash immediately. This is the scenario. The CDS contracts being sell and re-sell continuously among different financial sectors. In the mean time,
the market value of the CDS has reached 62 trillion.
 
However, you may see that, all the banks A, B, C, etc are making money. So, where is the money comes from?  The money comes from the revenue generated by the subprime mortgage business. So why the honey moon period can continue in the previous few years? It is because the real estate prices keep rising in the previous few years. In that period, home owners and buy and re-sell the real estates easily, who can earn good money at the same time. It just likes snowball or bubble. The market keeps rocking until 2006. When the downturns came, the prices of the real estates dropped. People who are lack of financial ability was unable to pay the high interests of those subprime loans. In that case, the subprime mortgage market started collapsing, which in turn affecting the CDS market. Banks and financial institutions who are involved in those products is unavoidably being affected. In fact, nearly all I-banks and most of the commercial banks are involved in this storm, or more appropriates, the tsunami. 

George C. (http://www.finance-database.com)

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Twitter
  • RSS
Comments ( 0 )
google adsense

Indeed, it goes without saying that taxes government does, well, it does not do well. Every major bubble burst in our economy always occurs due to inept government intervention, bad regulatory policy, bad tax policy incentives and/or lobbyist favors for one company over another. The list of mistakes made by politicians and our government are just too numerous to mention.

Presently, we are in a bit of hurt due to the subprime lending calamity, which sunk the overheated housing market. Now we hear politicians telling us that we can bail out our economy by investing in alternative energies, green technologies and environmental innovations. Interesting indeed, sure it makes sense leverage such technologies, the only problem is when government gets involved and pushes too hard. Next, they will start unbalancing the free-market playing field and diverting monies to these sectors.

As soon as they do entrepreneurs, corporations, vulture capitalists, investment banks and the like will start lining up to get some of this money flow. Since, the money flow will be so prevalent there will be no reason to go and create a new start-up that is actually viable, might ever earn a profit or even or even offer a reasonable ROI on energy savings for the buyers of the products or services. You see folks this is EXACTLY how the government tax bubbles in the marketplace, rather than letting the free-market do what it does best.

The free-markets deliver everything tax mistakes buy, sell or trade and they do it with efficiency. Why, because there is a profit motive to do so. If the government creates free-give-aways or offers tax incentives for one company over another, or one method or product over another; they favored method will become inefficient, that’s just a given.

Politicians need to stop steering investment dollars into green industries, rather the consumer should be allowed to choose which makes the most sense for them, this way the most efficient products and services will be the ones which help us into energy independence. Dear Citizen, the green tech sector is the next Bubble, it should be obvious. If you are enjoying things like the telecoms crash, DotCom bust, or the real estate and banking crisis fine, but if you are getting tired of this nonsense, why not look outside and observe what is really going on here?

There is no reason to keep repeating these ‘boom and bust cycles’ and sector rotations in our economy, no reason at all. Think on this.

“Lance Winslow” – Lance Winslow’s Bio. If you have innovative thoughts and unique perspectives, come think with Lance; http://www.WorldThinkTank.net/.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Twitter
  • RSS
Comments ( 0 )

Everybody who even perfunctory follows the news must have heard about the string of terrible financial developments in the United States. More and more investment and banking companies are going bankrupt or are being threatened by spreading credit crisis. This is a spillover effect from excessive lending practices during a prolonged housing bull market, which came to an end as a “bursting bubble” over a year ago.

Now more and more companies find themselves in possession of securities tied directly to mortgages issued during that time. With more and more houses going into foreclosures and loosing value, an increasing number financial instruments are rapidly becoming non performing, or outright worthless. Companies holding them are experiencing losses going into billions of dollars. Some of them are becoming insolvent.

Such was the case with Washington Mutual, which was seized by federal authorities and sold at a bargain price to JP Morgan Chase. Washington Mutual set a sad record, becoming the biggest bank to ever fail in USA. But not the only one lately. So far the crisis has claimed 12 banks, investment banks and even insurance companies, like the industry giant American Insurance Group.

To date US Treasury managed to avoid real disaster by stepping and taking over failing institutions or facilitating financing to keep them alive, by lending money to other companies for purchase of weakened rivals. Intervention has cost Treasury hundreds of billions of dollars, including $25 billion to bailout Bear Sterns, $100 billions each for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, $85 billion for AIG. This list goes on and on.

Now FED is asking congress for additional $700 billions in order to bail out entire financial industry, by establishing a market for mortgage backed securities. Federal authorities would purchase instrument from most at risk firms. That would set some kind of pricing guidelines for all other such securities, making it possible for all holders of such notes to start trading in them again, potentially lowering risk of owning them.

Nobody really knows if this is going to be enough, but the price of such action will be staggering. With the money already spent and the funds requested, the total bill will surely top $1 trillion dollar by a wide margin. This would signal new wave of borrowing by Treasury, which would last for years and push the total debt level into record and uncharted level.

Dollar lost value while all this was unfolding, and is likely to continue slide until congress works out details of this massive funds infusion. After that it will take some time to see if the steps FED is taking are having desired effect. US dollar will probably stay under pressure during this time. One might expect this to continue through the reminder of 2008.

In order to finance rising level of debt, we can expect to see interest rates rise on USD, which would make Treasury paper more attractive. Combined with economic slow down in the rest of the world, this might prove very bullish for dollar going into 2009. This will only be the case if the interest increases are done in a slow, measured pace and not due to some market panic. This particular scenario is compatible with very long term dollar charts.

We should be watching with interest what comes out of the chambers of congress. Once the funding is granted, it will be up to the financial authorities to prove it is money well spent. If it works even half as well as promised, we should see steady appreciation of Dollar in 2009 and perhaps a little longer.

Mike P. Kulej is a Chief Forex Strategist for Spectrum Forex LLC. He specializes in mechanical trading systems as explained on http://www.spectrumforex.com. Spectrum Forex LLC offers numerous services to individual traders. He also publishes trading blog http://www.fxmadness.com. With questions and comments e-mail him at kulej@spectrumforex.com

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Twitter
  • RSS
Comments ( 0 )